Mwalimu Julius Nyerere the founder President of Tanzania, devoted most of his policies and efforts to rural development through the policy of Ujamaa whose objective was the emancipation of the poor from abject poverty and deprivation. He abolished feudal tenure and steered the promulgation of the Arusha Declaration in 1967 as a blue print for socialist state driven development. Its implementation started with villages settlements which were self-directing and voluntary but when the pace of voluntarism became slow force was used to move people into planned villages. The policy failed to achieve optimum results for several reasons. First as people were moved from their traditional habitats, they lost motivation to work. Secondly, the implementation shifted from participatory to coercive approaches which led to resentment. Third while the President was committed to equality and grassroots based participation, his implementers believed in top down prescriptive and bureaucratic approaches. Fourth, the policy was predicated on assumption of communalism and collectivism as inherent features of African systems of production and distribution while those practices were already surpassed by the emergence of commodity production and capitalism even before colonial invasions. Due to these and other factors, Ujamaa policy neither reduced poverty nor did it increase prosperity for the poor or the country as a whole.This book focuses on the role of rural development policy and its contribution to poverty reduction in Tanzania. It has seven chapters starting with an introduction on Ujamaa policy; chapter two on the role of education in creating capacity for innovation among smallholder farmers and chapter three on the introduction of tiller technology in selected districts and challenges that limited its adoption and diffusion. Chapter four analyses three phases of targeted input subsidies to farmers and the success and challenges of this policy in each phase. Chapter five is about the tobacco value chain in Tanzania and the future of this crop in the light of international regulations and competition. Chapter six compares the development and management of cashew value chains in Vietnam with and Tanzania. Chapter seven uses two case studies to indicate conditions that make it possible for state and civil society organizations to work together on poverty alleviation
Related Articles
Safeguarding Digital Labour: Data Protection for Platform Workers
The digital revolution, coupled with the rise of the gig economy has transformed the way work is understood and performed globally. The gig work—temporary and flexible jobs offered by online platforms—has become increasingly prominent in Tanzania as it is in other parts of the world. Gig platforms in Tanzania offer opportunities but also raise data […]
Tourism in Tanzania: status, trend, and existing growth potentials
Tourism plays a significant role in livelihoods & poverty reduction, directly employing over 1.4 million workers and contributing 17% to GDP. Notwithstanding a near 75% decline following the global outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, receipts from international arrivals doubled between 2012 and 2023. Synergies between tourism and other sectors can be leveraged to facilitate much […]
Dignifying Well-being of Women: Labour Conditions in Solid Waste Management in Tanzania Cities
Gender disparities readily appear across the waste management value chain, reflecting prevalent imbalances in the socioeconomic structures. Women are predominantly situated in low-pay, insecure roles, and insufficient attention is directed toward addressing their needs during the maternity period. There is an urgent necessity to integrate a gender perspective into decision-making and policy formulation within the […]
Re-examining the Citizens’ Preferences for the Political Party Systems in Tanzania after 1992
After the re-adoption of multipartyism in Tanzania in 1992, the preference of many adult Tanzanians for the political party system changed from a single-party system to pluralism. However, in 2005, the number of citizens who preferred a single-party system surpassed the number of those who favoured multipartyism. This could have been influenced by the heightened […]